What Happens When AI Undermines Your Value?
A Letter to Patent Attorneys
You Don't Know Me (But I've Been Supporting Your Work for 24 Years)

My name is Rich Mallinson, and for nearly a quarter century, I've been behind the scenes… supporting your work.
I'm a patent translator.
I've spent two decades learning the language of patents—the precision, the terminology, the way claims need to be constructed across languages so they hold up in any jurisdiction.
But here's the thing…
I've been watching my own work get eroded. First by machine translation. And now… by AI.
Tools that can do in seconds what used to take me hours. Tools that don't care about my 24 years of experience or my knowledge of patent language.
And I have a feeling… you might know what that's like.
Actually, before I go any further—I should probably thank you.
Because without patent attorneys… without your work… I wouldn't have had anything to translate in the first place.
So… thank you. Genuinely.
And that's actually one of my motivations for reaching out today.
The Tension Nobody Wants to Talk About
I've been talking to a lot of patent attorneys lately.
And there's this tension I keep hearing about—this thing that nobody really wants to say out loud.
On one hand, AI is supposedly going to change everything. Automate drafting. Speed up prosecution. Maybe even replace some of the work that used to require real expertise.
On the other hand… most attorneys I talk to say their pipeline hasn't changed. Still referral-dependent. Still waiting for the phone to ring. Still not sure what to do differently.
And I keep thinking… is anyone actually spending time figuring out how to grow their practice in this new era?
Or is everyone just hoping it works out?
Because here's what I've learned from watching my own business get disrupted:
Hoping doesn't work.
Sound Familiar?
Referral-Dependent
Your pipeline depends on who you know, not what you know. When referrals slow down, revenue follows.
No Time to Prospect
You barely have time to bill—let alone search for new inventors, vet opportunities, and write outreach.
BizDev Is Expensive
Hiring BD staff or marketing agencies costs six figures with no guarantee of ROI in patent prosecution.
Let Me Ask You Something
When's the last time you actually thought about what happens to your practice if you don't adapt?
Not “what if business slows down”—that's obvious.
I mean:
- What happens when bigger firms with bigger marketing budgets are reaching inventors before you even know they exist?
- What happens when AI tools get good enough that clients start questioning what they're paying for?
- What happens when the referral network you've spent years building… just doesn't produce like it used to?
Most attorneys I talk to have this nagging feeling that something's shifting. They just don't know what to do about it.
So they do nothing. And hope.
I tried that approach with my translation business. I can tell you how it ends.
The Question Isn't “How Much Does It Cost to Adapt?”
The question is: “What's the cost of NOT adapting?”
Every week you wait, there are inventors—in your exact practice area—who just published research. They don't have patent attorneys yet. And a 12-month statutory bar countdown just started ticking.
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) doesn't care that you're busy. It doesn't care that you're “thinking about it.” It doesn't care about your networking schedule.
One year from publication, their filing rights disappear. Forever.
And while you're waiting for referrals… someone else might be reaching them first.
Here's What I Built (Instead of Just Watching My Industry Change)
I decided to build something that could actually help.
A white-label inventor outreach service for patent attorneys.

Here's how it works:
FIND — Systematic Signal Discovery
I monitor 50,000+ academic preprints, NIH grants, and SBIR awards every month—filtered by YOUR CPC codes. AI, biotech, cleantech, materials science—whatever you practice.
When I find patent-ready research, the system automatically:
- Calculates days to statutory bar deadline
- Scores urgency (Critical < 90 days, High 90–180 days)
- Extracts inventor contact information
- Identifies competitive landscape
BRIEF — White-Label IP Assessment Briefs
When we identify a high-priority inventor, I generate a professional IP Value Assessment Brief with:
- YOUR firm name
- YOUR headshot
- YOUR credentials
- YOUR calendar link
It includes USPTO prior art search, competitive landscape analysis, their 102(b) deadline… all white-labeled as coming from you.
Inventors think YOU personally analyzed their work.
OUTREACH — Done-For-You Email Campaigns
I run the outreach email campaigns ON YOUR BEHALF.
- Three-email sequences designed for patent-ready inventors
- Automated follow-ups with urgency messaging
- Reply monitoring and sentiment detection
When an inventor responds positively—“yes, I want to talk about IP protection”—I forward it to you immediately with full context.
You just show up to the consultation—and close.
One More Thing: We Build Your Credibility BEFORE We Send the First Email
Before we even launch your first campaign, we build your reputation with PatentPost.
It's automated LinkedIn content that positions you as a thought leader in patent strategy—so when inventors Google you before the call, they see an active, credible expert.
We don't just send emails. We build your reputation first.
(PatentPost normally costs $147/month—it's included FREE with our higher-tier service packages.)
What This Looks Like For You
Monday: You log into your dashboard and see 12 new signals in your practice areas—each with a countdown timer showing exactly how many days remain before filing rights expire.
Tuesday: You identify 3 high-value opportunities (under 90 days, SBIR-funded, university-based).
Wednesday: With one click, you generate personalized IP Assessment Briefs for all three. The system sends white-labeled outreach that same day.
Friday: One inventor replies: “This is incredibly helpful. Can we schedule a call?”
Next Monday: You show up to the consultation. The inventor has already read your brief, understands their 102(b) deadline, and is ready to discuss filing strategy.
End of month: You've signed a new engagement.
That's what systematic inventor acquisition looks like.
System Capability Proof
50K+
Preprints monitored monthly
847
Biotech signals with <90-day deadlines (last 30 days)
IP Radar tracks 100+ CPC verticals—from biotech and pharma to AI, semiconductors, medical devices, and clean energy. This isn't theoretical. The system exists. It works. And it's built specifically for patent attorneys like you.
What You Get
First-mover advantage — See patent-worthy research the moment it’s published, not months later through secondhand referrals
Time-based prioritization — Never miss an urgent deadline again; know exactly which opportunities need immediate outreach
Differentiated outreach — Stop sending generic emails that get deleted; reach out with specific intelligence that demonstrates expertise
Predictable pipeline — Move from feast-or-famine referral dependency to systematic, repeatable inventor acquisition
Reduced BD time — Stop manually searching databases; let the system surface relevant opportunities automatically
Higher response rates — Personalized outreach based on specific technology knowledge converts better than generic pitches
Built credibility — PatentPost positions you as a thought leader BEFORE outreach emails ever land (included FREE on higher tiers)
Here's What I'd Suggest
Tell me your practice area—AI, biotech, cleantech, whatever—and I'll generate a free Firm Briefing for you.
It'll show you:
- Real TTO opportunities in your territory right now
- Real inventors publishing patent-ready research
- Real 102(b) deadlines ticking down
- Real competitive landscape data in your practice areas
Takes me 10 minutes to generate. Could be worth six figures to you.
If you look at it and think “this isn't for me”… totally fine. I appreciate you reading this far.
But if you look at it and think “why isn't everyone doing this?”—then let's talk.
My Guarantee to You
Try the service for 30 days.
If you don't get at least 5 qualified consultations with patent-ready inventors… I'll keep working until you do.
No refund games. I just keep running campaigns—better targeting, better messaging, better briefs—until you hit the number.
Because if you're not getting results… I'm not doing my job.
Here's Why This Matters NOW
The attorneys who build systematic pipelines now will have compounding advantages over the next decade.
Every day you wait, statutory bars are expiring on technologies you could have prosecuted.
Every week, inventors are being contacted by attorneys who found them through systematic research—not referrals.
The window on each opportunity is literally finite. 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) doesn't negotiate.
And the attorneys who understand that systematic inventor acquisition isn't optional anymore… they're already moving.
The question isn't whether this works.
The question is whether you'll be one of the attorneys doing it—or one of the attorneys wondering how your competitors keep finding the best opportunities.
Your Next Step (Choose One):
Option 1: Get Your Free Firm Briefing
See real patent-ready inventors in your practice area with active 102(b) deadlines
Get Free Firm BriefingOption 2: Book a 15-Minute Demo
See the platform live, ask questions, and see signals in your specific verticals
Schedule DemoCommon Questions
“Does this actually work for my practice area?”
IP Radar tracks 100+ CPC verticals—from biotech and pharma to AI, semiconductors, medical devices, clean energy, and more. If it has a CPC code, we likely cover it. Book a demo to see signals in your specific verticals.
“I don’t do cold outreach. Isn’t that unprofessional?”
There’s a difference between generic spam and value-driven outreach. When you reach out to an inventor with a detailed brief about their specific technology, their competitive landscape, and their filing deadline—you’re not cold calling. You’re demonstrating expertise.
“How is this different from buying lead lists?”
Lead lists give you names. IP Radar gives you intelligence—specific research signals with calculated deadlines, competitive context, and ready-to-send outreach materials. It’s the difference between a phone book and a business development system.
“How much time does this take?”
Most attorneys spend 15–30 minutes per week reviewing signals and approving outreach campaigns. The system does the heavy lifting of monitoring, classifying, and scoring—you just decide which opportunities to pursue.
“What if I don’t see results?”
Read the free briefing. Book a demo. See real signals in your verticals before committing to anything. If it’s not obviously valuable for your practice, no hard feelings.
A Final Word
Look, I'm not going to pretend I have all the answers.
I'm a translator who's been in the patent world for 24 years, watching it change, trying to stay relevant.
But I genuinely believe that the attorneys who build systems to find opportunities—instead of waiting for them—are going to win the next decade.
And I want to help you be one of them.
Genuinely… thank you.
Without attorneys like you, I wouldn't have had 24 years of work translating the innovations you protect.
Now let me return the favor.
— Rich

Rich Mallinson
Founder, Integira · IP Radar
Systematic practice growth shouldn't require a business development hire.